See what happens when you make bad decisions — namely, choosing the Other Guys subpar cable services.
David Robertson publishes an open letter in response. I would like to answer some of the questions you raise in the clip below. I have heard you raise them several times before as though they were slam-dunk unanswerable questions.
Let me at least do you the courtesy of assuming that they are genuine questions and not just accusations. Why is there something instead of nothing?
The question itself is the oldest and deepest philosophical question — and of enormous significance to everyone of us. Avoiding it, is not really answering.
And I would love to hear what the third choice is…1 something 2 nothing 3 …? The Question is not Why, but How? You dismiss the question of why, I suspect because you have no answer. Forgive me saying this but only regarding as legitimate those questions to which you have an answer, is neither humble nor intelligent.
For Christians both the Why and the How are vital. Today a friend of mine is being buried after a tragic death. I know How he died, but what is far more important to me is Why. We may not know the answers, but the question goes deep.
Humans are the only animal who ask the why question. By it you show your faith and your belief system. You of course have no evidence or proof for that. You just believe it. The trouble is, as AJ Ayer the prime founder of that philosophy admitted towards the end of his life — it is a self-contradicting philosophy.
You claim to have a belief based on science and evidence — and yet that belief itself has no evidence! Speaking of self-refuting statements, lets move on to your next gem! And yet you say you do know or at least are convinced that there is no God. I know this is part of the atheist creed, repeated ad nauseam online and in debates as though it were a devastating soundbite.
But it is completely superfluous. Happy to send you a copy if you want! The fact is that your atheism belief there is no God is based upon your belief system as outlined abovewhich is itself atheistical. Can you prove there is a God? Actually it depends what you mean by prove.
Can you prove there are minds other than your own? Can you prove that we did not all come into existence yesterday? Can you prove that we are not all wired into the Matrix? But what you are doing is a mental slight of hand. And the answer is yes — overwhelming. The trouble is that you have already pre-determined that there can be no such evidence and therefore because of your atheist faith see above you automatically dismiss or explain away any such evidence.
You remind me of the atheist on the Dawkins website who told me that it was impossible to have an intelligent discussion with someone who believed in God. A superb example of circular reasoning. But one you seem to have bought into hook, line and sinker…. Maybe its time to break out of that very closed-minded circular outlook?
The trouble is that its such a dumb argument because it is arguing against polytheism not monotheism. By logical definition there cannot be two never mind two thousand Almighty, Eternal, Omnipotent, Omnipresent, Supreme Beings who created everything! There is the Creator and from that Creator comes all created things.
If you stopped and thought about what you were saying and stopped repeating it as some kind of mantra delivered from on high, you would see the illogicality of your own statement.
You have been arguing that science works precisely because it is fathomable and now you are saying it is unfathomable. I think of people like Francis Collins, the scientist behind the Human Genome project, who pointed out that we believe because of what we see, not because of what we do not see.Insane Troll Logic is the kind of logic that just can't be argued with because it's so demented, so lost in its own insanity, that any attempts to make it rational would make it more barnweddingvt.com is logic failure that crosses over into parody or Poe's Law.A character thinks in such a blatantly illogical manner that it has to be deliberate on the part of the writer.
Ricky Gervais Makes a Case for Atheism in the WSJ - The Atlantic 20 Dec Ricky Gervais Makes a Case for Atheism in the WSJ the word ass in an ad for blue jeans--decided to run an essay by a .
All the latest news, reviews, pictures and video on culture, the arts and entertainment. FAITH Stephen Colbert and Ricky Gervais Debate the Existence of God. Unsurprisingly, the Catholic host failed to convince his atheist guest that God exists.
Dec 19, · News Corp is a network of leading companies in the worlds of diversified media, news, education, and information services.
Aug 31, · Ricky Gervais, creator of the British series "The Office," wrote about his religious journey in an essay published in by the Wall Street Journal.