Write ahead logging sqlite gui

WAL mode can only be changed when there are no transactions in progress.

Write ahead logging sqlite gui

This ended write ahead logging sqlite gui being much more difficult than I ever would have imagined. We have grown accustomed to the speed and responsiveness of multi-gigahertz processors, and the mere megahertz processor in the Pi is noticeably slower at most tasks.

This leads me to my problem. In the web app I was working on, I found that a certain button click event was causing the entire application to lock up and become unresponsive for over 10 seconds! I dug into what was happening and found that, in that situation, the contents of a table in the database were being deleted, and about 20 new rows were being added.

I could write the new entries on paper in that much time! I was using ActiveRecord to access the data, and I first thought I must be configuring or using it wrong. One of my coworkers suggested that I try using the SQLite command line interface to insert and delete rows from a database to see the problem was with SQLite itself.

Atomic Object’s blog on everything we find fascinating.

I was shocked to find that a single insert statement took anywhere from 2 to 5 seconds! One quick look at the SQLite documentation and you will see that there are quite a lot of configuration settings that can be changed to tweak performance to your needs.

SQLite Optimization Experiments I wrote a simple test script that creates a database, and then performs cycles while recording the time.

write ahead logging sqlite gui

Each cycle inserts 5 records into the database, deletes the records, and then inserts 5 more. First I tried running the script with the default settings. The results were, as expected, very bad. In fact, it took so long I had to terminate the script because it was taking so long.

Each cycle was taking about 30 seconds. The SQLite documentation indicates that including many operations in a single transaction will increase performance.

The chart below proves this to be true. Each cycle now takes approximately. This is a significant improvement over the seconds per operation that I was seeing before. One thing worth noting is the total test time. Each point on the chart represents the time that it took for one cycle of the test.


The total test time is the sum of all the cycles plus any overhead from starting or stopping transactions. For this first optimized run the total test time was 3.

write ahead logging sqlite gui

If we add up the times for all the cycles the sum is only 0. That means there was about 2. Journaling is a technique that SQLite uses to ensure that the database does not become corrupt in the event of a power failure or system crash. It also allows for atomic transactions.

Journaling involves storing changes to the database in a separate file and then merging the changes in at later time.

You can read more about WAL journaling mode. For this test, I did not group the inserts and deletes into a single transaction; each operation is a separate transaction.

From the chart below we can see that using WAL journaling mode is also a significant improvement over the default settings.

However, notice the spike at cycle I believe this is the point at which the database is performing a checkpointing operation. Checkpointing is where the journaling file is synchronized with the actual database file.

This operation took 4. Also notice that the very first cycle took about 1. The total time for this run was 7.

That is almost double the total time of the first run.By default, the auxiliary write ahead log and shared memory files used for transaction control are automatically deleted when the latest connection to the database closes.

So ensure that all database connections are closed at some time. 1. Use Forensic Recovery for SQLite to carve all the records from the WAL file and insert them into a new database 2. Use SQLite Forensic Explorer to look at the WAL file page by page. I will discuss both methods: SQLite Forensic Recovery and Explorer are only available as part of the SQLite Forensic Toolkit, more information here.

Here’s the secret: enable Write-Ahead Logging (aka WAL). Normally when you update your SQLite Database within a transaction, the original data is copied to a rollback file. The new data is written directly to the DB file. This results in two disk writes for every DB change.

When you COMMIT, the rollback file is . A WAL (write-ahead log) mode is introduced as of SQLite This mode is persistent, and it stays in effect even after closing and reopening the database.

This mode is persistent, and it stays in effect even after closing and reopening the database. Write Ahead Logging with SQLite, also known as WAL, is the standard method that states how SQLite implements the rollback and commit processes with this mobile database system.

The disk access and input and output operations are more sequential, using the WAL methods.

Speed up SQLite with Write-Ahead Logging – Xojo Blog

WAL in SQLite. In regards to WAL (write-ahead-logging) support being added to SQLite for version , I have a few comments, questions, suggestions, etc.

Most of them refer to parts of.

Hacking Exposed Computer Forensics Blog: Daily Blog # SQLite Write Ahead Logs and Python